The Mormon Cult

74

By Mtbailz

Gingrich v. Mormon Religion

Craig Bergman resigned yesterday (probably asked to leave) from Newt Gingrich's campaign because of his comment claiming Mormonism was a "cult". Well, shame on Mr. Gingrich for not defending one of his campaign manager's truthful statements. It's not everyday, a man exposes a religion for what it is; a cult. The Mormon religion has always been regarded as a cult, and it is a fair assessment. It doesn't matter how much Mitt Romney hates his religion coming up in public discourse, the truth is the truth. The Church of Latter Day Saints (LDS) has been around since the 1830s and its history is full of cult-like qualities. From its founding prophet and leader, to its modern religious interpretations, the fundamentals of Mormonism are as strange as any cult you have heard of.

Let's Define Cult

Before we get ahead of ourselves, let's make sure we are using the same definition of the word cult. As defined by dictionary.com a cult is, "a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies." I double checked the reliability of this definition with the Merriam-Webster definition. Interestingly enough the definitions were similar, but the latter applied the modern connotation that most people apply to a cult. It reads, "a religion regarded as unorthodox, or spurious," meaning false. Therefore, using these two descriptions, Mormon religious belief falls under the cult qualifications. The Church of Latter Day Saints is both a system of religious worship and regarded, rightfully so, as spurious.

Mormonism Exposed

In order to prove a simple point, I would like to give the reader a scenario. A young man, around the age of 22, named Joseph Smith comes to you claiming God, through an angel, has given him the mission of beginning a new religion. He tells you about the golden tablets he has uncovered, practically in his back yard, and how they came equipped with, "two stones fastened to a breastplate," which has the ability to translate the 1400 year old text (The History of Joseph Smith verses: 34-35). On top of this, the stones actually have names; Urim and Thummim, says the young man, have allowed him to translate the literal word of God. So tell me, would you believe him? If your answer is absolutely not, then I commend you on your sanity and regret to inform you that the Mormon religion and Mormon cult are not for you.

And, the evidence against the fundamental pieces of mormonism don't stop there. Not only does the founder of Mormonism have a tendency to exaggerate the truth, but he is also a plagiariser. B.H. Roberts, a Mormon leader and firm holder of the faith, questioned the Book of Mormon and began to compare it with the Bible. The results are interesting. The table below will hopefully exemplify the plagiarised tendencies of Joseph Smith.

3 Nephi: 22
Isaiah 54
And then shall that which is written
 
come to pass: Sing O "barren, thou
Sing O "barren, thou
that didst not bear; break forth into
that didst not bear; break forth into
singing, and cry aloud, thou that
singing, and cry aloud, thou that
didst not travail with child ; for more
didst not travail with child ; for more
are the children of the desolate than
are the children of the desolate than
the children of the married wife, saith
the children of the married wife, saith
the Lord.
the Lord

These are only the first verses of both Isaiah and 3 Nephi, however the entirety of that Book of Mormon chapter is identical to Isaiah 54. Here's another one:

3 Nephi 12: 3-5
Matthew 5: 3-5
 
 
Yea, blessed are the poor in spirit who come unto me,
Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
And again, blessed are they that mourn,
Blessed are they that mourn:
for they shall be comforted.
for they shall be comforted.
And blessed are the meek,
Blessed are the meek:
for they shall inherit the earth.
for they shall inherit the earth.
 
 

If the reader is familiar with the beatitudes then they will know the rest. And yes, the Books of Mormon uses, pretty much, the same exact ones. Nonetheless you see the copying that took place in the 1830s. And trust me, it didn't stop there. When you get a chance, and if you're interested, compare (1 Nephi 20-21) and (2 Nephi 7, 8, 12-24) to (Isaiah 48-49, 50, 51:1-2, 52: 2-14). But, in order to stop kicking a dead horse I'll move on.

The founder of Mormonism and the golden tablets he "translated" have evolved into modern Mormon beliefs. I'm not going to be ignorant enough to claim that polygamy is still rampant throughout the faith, but I will bring up three interesting "fun facts". First and foremost, Mormon doctrine states that Jesus, after being resurrected actually set foot on American soil where he presented himself to the Native Americans. Although there could never be actual solid evidence for such a story, it is a cool story nonetheless. Secondly, Mormons believe that the Garden of Eden was an actual place and it was found in the state of Missouri. That's right, the Garden of Eden is an American landmark right along with Mount Rushmore, the White House, and the Baseball Hall of Fame.

All joking aside, the last fact is actually a bit disturbing. Until 1978 blacks were forbidden from entering the priesthood. Although segregation had been outlawed for quite sometime, the Mormon religion still refused the entry of blacks into high ranking positions within the church. It was church doctrine to believe that the race was black due to the mark of Cain, which shows the racial tendency of a cult. The most disturbing piece to this story is that Mitt Romney was a practicing Mormon adult during this time. A man, with the ability to reason properly, would not stand for such injustice even within his own church. As a presidential candidate this should be a question that is drilled into him in every debate and ever interview. His compliance with such a disgraceful rule says more about his character than all the family ads he has been spewing over mainstream TV.

A True Mormon Cult

So, as can be seen, Mormonism is undoubtedly a cult. First of all, they follow religious rites and worship. Secondly, and more importantly, the Church of Latter Day Saints is unorthodox and completely false. Joseph Smith created a hoax that may go down as one of the greatest in history, and the religious culture he grew degrades blacks to the point of punishing them with the supposed mark of Cain. It makes sense that a disgusting cult would derive from a young man who was given too much power at an early age. But, I digress. This should be a national topic and Mitt Romney should be forced to answer tough questions about it. Newt Gingrich helped Governor Romney yesterday by allowing Craig Bergman to resign, and with him went our chance to have a national debate on Mormonism specifically, and cults in general.

I'm not the only one who thinks this!

Unsaintly Saints: The Mormons in Their Own Words
Amazon Price: $2.00
The Mormon Mirage: A Former Member Looks at the Mormon Church Today
Amazon Price: $9.85
List Price: $16.99
The Kingdom of the Cults-Mormonism-Part 1
Amazon Price: $18.00

Comments

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 5 months ago

Rather than a religous "national debate" about a fine man's sincere personal religious beliefs, let's adhere to the Constitution which says "...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." Freedom of religion in America is just that, freedom for all Americans to believe and practice according to the dictates of their own consciences. Speaker Gingrich chose to take "the high road" in the ongoing national debate and has every right to freely associate himself with staff and advisors who exemplify his lead wherever it may take him. He apparently views Mr. Romney as a worthy opponent, and many other Americans also regard him as such.

Cranfordjs profile image

Cranfordjs Level 2 Commenter 5 months ago

Next time a Mormon comes to my door, he or she is getting a printed copy of this hub! Damn you Mormons, don't you know I'm hung over every Saturday morning!

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 5 months ago

Cranfordjs, I would be honored to have you hand this post to any mormon looking for new converts.

-mtbailz

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 5 months ago

Perspycacious, I agree the constitution is clear about the use of religious texts for men and women running for office. The government, by no means, has the right to create a religious test that those running must pass. However, this does not mean those voting have to excuse Mitt Romney or any other candidate for their unorthodox cultish beliefs. It would be wrong of me and anyone else to look past his membership in a religious institution that degraded blacks and believed in the nonsense of joseph smith.

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 5 months ago

Was it nonsense to have their homes and farms and businesses looted and confiscated because the LDS of that day believed in the equality of all men? Not a few LDS were murdered because of Missouri's infamous "expulsion order" much of which was over the injustice of slavery which LDS members could not uphold then or now.

The question you refer to is the holding of the priesthood within the LDS church and that was open to all worthy male members by revelaton in June of 1978. Female members of the LDS faith are still not eligible to hold the priesthood (the same is true of the Catholic Church today.)

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 5 months ago via iphone

First of all, it is nonsense to have persecuted mormons to the point of death. I don't think anywhere within my hub or comment do I even come close to implying that. Second of all, why would it take god until 1978 to reveal such a new way of conducting the religion. It's preposterous and should be seen as nothing else other than racism.

Perspycacious 5 months ago

I don't pretend to know what God chooses to do and when. Why was the Gospel first preached to the Jews and revelaton given to Peter that it could then go to the Gentiles? In God's time I am sure that it happened when it happened and for a good reason. Overdue? I like to think so, but who am I to judge God.

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 5 months ago

You just judged god by saying you thought his actions were overdue. Nonetheless it's ok to judge anyone if they allow segregation due to race. It's wrong no matter who does it and that includes a god

Michele Travis profile image

Michele Travis Level 7 Commenter 5 months ago

What is interesting about Mormons to me, is the fact they "added" to the teachings of the bible. That is a sin. Look at Revelation 22:18-19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book. If anyone adds anything to them , God will add to them the plagues, described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life, and in the holy city, which are described in this book.

We cannot add anything to the bible!

Thank you,

Fantastic Hub

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 5 months ago via iphone

Very interesting point, and a truthful one too! Thanks for the insight Michele

Just In Time 7 weeks ago

Michele Travis, Mtbailz - I remember when I asked that question. How can someone add on to the Bible if it says in Revelation 22, not to? The answer was, I never read the bible entirely and only knew about what others told me. Apparently, that was not the only time we are told not to add or remove from the Bible or the commandments of the Lord. Take a look, and keep in mind, the Bible is not laid out in chronological order of the date of the writings:

Deuteronomy 4:2 - Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

Deuteronomy 12:32 - What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Proverbs 30:5-6 - Every word of God [is] pure: he [is] a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.

Revelation 22:18-19 - For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

How many times was it written saying the same thing, yet more was added?

Can you and I have different testimonies about the same thing and still share the same message? (i.e. I love Dr Pepper, You like Dr Pepper = We think Dr Pepper is good.) I know it’s over simplified but you get my point, right?

Now let me ask you, is the Book of Mormon part of the Bible? Is it added to the Bible? Or, is it a separate book, a separate testament of Jesus Christ? This is the title of the book: The Book of Mormon Another Testament of Jesus Christ.

I do not recall the Book of Mormon teaching that which is opposite of the Bible.

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

Well said, justintime.

All of us, of any faith and belief, can be judged by our fellowmen according to our works and words.

Ideally we would not be judged for our beliefs, except as those beliefs are reflected in our works and words. Faith and belief is hallowed in America as a freedom of every American. Surely candidates will be judged by voters, and ultimately by God, the only righteous judge.

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 7 weeks ago

@justintime--- I think I get your point, but this does not make the LSD any less cult like. Whether or not they are religiously allowed to add onto original texts, the belief is still considered "unorthodox".

@Perspycacious--- It's also acceptable to judge based on one's inaction. Take Mitt Romney and his inaction when it came to releasing African-Americans from the degrading position their church placed them in. His lack of action should be judged accordingly.

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

It is part of Governor Romney's beliefs that not all things are done because a man, or even public opinion, would seem to dictate otherwise. Catholics deal with the same admonitions, and so do other faiths. If a belief is based on a conviction that God has not yet said yes, no, or even maybe to what the public may perceive as unjust, the faithful wait and some even protest by seeking a faith more in keeping with their personal belief in questions of doctrine. Some churches cannot agree with honoring the idea of divorce. Some faiths consider it as acceptable to have a simple "writ" (even verbal) "of divorcement". Many areas of the moslem world recognize plural marriages, while other areas legislate against them as America has done and continues to do. Some churches welcome everyone (as I believe Christ does.) Some are exclusive as some American churches have a history of having been. Some require licensed clergy or certain levels of academic training they argue are "for the well-being of the flock." Other churches have lay ministers, both men and women. Some churches believe in uniforms or "Sunday best", while others are fine with T Shirts and flip flops. Some of these are questions of doctrine, some simply questions of custom. Customs change, doctrines tend to require more than what some would call "just plain common sense" because a present sense has made it more common. A person faithful to their church's doctrine is exercising the same faith as any other person faithful to their church's doctrine. They remain free to question those doctrines, whether they be the Ten Commandments or vestments, but their ultimate choice is to remain faithful or to worship elsewhere, or alone. Some churches, in combining with another church of differing diciplines, change doctrines of long standing, leading some members and outsiders to label them "wishy washy" and others to wonder "Is it God's church, or man's?" You are free, of course, to decide to judge another for their tolerance over time of a doctrine you feel to have been false. The one you judge must deal with his own conscience in his own way.

Michele Travis profile image

Michele Travis Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

That is why we really need a Separation of Church and State.

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

We have a separation of church and state. Sad to say, the same concern about JFK's Catholicism is now being voiced by some about Santorum and Romney. It was laid to rest (we thought) when America elected its first Roman Catholic president, but religious bias seems to have a life of its own.

Michele Travis profile image

Michele Travis Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

Yes, as you stated, we do have a separation of church and state, but I don't think anyone is letting it happen. If an atheist ran for President can you even imagine how many people would use that as a reason to not vote for him? Every media station, even Fox or Faux news would be against him.

Perspycacious profile image

Perspycacious Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

or her (please.) [That one has yet to be overcome, too!]

Michele Travis profile image

Michele Travis Level 7 Commenter 7 weeks ago

You are right about that also :)

Rodric29 profile image

Rodric29 Level 4 Commenter 6 weeks ago

I actually thought that when I read this hub it would have something of value in it. Way I find is that you platitudes and misdirecting definitions do nothing but beat a dead horse. I want you to reread your own article and put whatever religion in the place of Mormon and see if you can't make it fit.

If you are trying to win a popularity contest, congratulations. I fell for it.

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 6 weeks ago

Rodric,

Misdirecting definitions? I don't how that's possible. Definitions are definitions. I didn't take them out of context or anything of the sort. When it comes to other religions, I would agree with you. Putting any type of religion in place of Mormonism would still work. I guess all religions are cults. Thanks for stopping by.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working