Bloggers and the News Media

67

By Mtbailz

I'm sure you've checked the national headlines for the past few days. It's tough to miss them. No matter where you go they pop out at you. You sign onto the internet and there they are, you grab your daily cup of coffee and they stare while you make your purchase, and whenever you talk to someone they always come up in conversation. For instance, have you heard about the Amanda Knox story? I'm sure you have. How about the missing baby from Missouri (Lisa Irwin)? Again, I'm sure you have at least heard something about it. But, have you ever sat back and thought about the stories the news media wants you to hear, see, and read? Most of it is trivial when related to our everyday lives.


Source: Grant Cochrane

I'm sure any sane person doesn't think I don't care that there is a missing baby who has yet to be found. I am as compassionate as any other, but to hear the story day in and day out is almost unethical. First of all, the publicity that shines on this investigation can be detrimental to ongoing police action. The last thing any law enforcement agent needs is to be followed everywhere they go by their personal paparazzi.

News outlets are spewing news that simply does not matter, and it is taking our attention away from more pressing issues. In today's top national news CNN and MSNBC both took the time and effort to report on a man that dresses up in a super hero costume and was arrested for assault. Fox decided that it was important enough to include "Moose takes a dip in family pool" in their daily top national news. Both CBS and ABC reported on the new Dr. Pepper commercials that try to convince men to buy diet soda. CBS also took the time to publish a report on the woman who gave birth after finishing the Chicago Marathon. Putting aside the fact that the woman put her child at risk, the story is just not important enough to be considered news.

It is true that these stories are intertwined with stories that do have some real significance. The political field is being covered, the financial institutions are being covered, and the protests that seem to be popping up everywhere gain quite about of attention. However, these stories are still not good enough. Lou Dobbs, a figure that I'm still not 100% sure of, wrote about the idea that news agencies have a tendency to regurgitate, verbatim, what politicians, economists, and business leaders have already said. They put a little fluff in there and call it a news story. There is no evaluation or analysis added in which makes its more of a press release.

This is where bloggers come in. They have the ability to make a stronger news media. There are millions of fact checkers and writers who are more than willing to do what the media won't do. They take the facts and analyze them so that they are not merely words. An actual conversation is created that allows anyone with an internet connection to speak out for what they believe. Blogs put a human voice on the news that CNN, FOX, MSNBC, and ABC simply can't do. These news agencies supply the blogs with facts, but the everyday people writing their opinions are doing the hard work. In the long run these "laymen" could restore some sanity into daily news and save the institution intself.

Vote Here

Do you think blogs have the capacity to make news media a more successful medium?

  • Yes
  • No
See results without voting

This book isn't all about the media, but it does have a wonderful section on the news media's problems. Nonetheless, an interesting read.

War on the Middle Class: How the Government, Big Business, and Special Interest Groups Are Waging War on the American Dream and How to Fight Back
Amazon Price: $1.91
List Price: $15.00

Let me hear what you think!

CWanamaker profile image

CWanamaker Level 5 Commenter 7 months ago

Yeah its interesting to think about why certain news stories become news. Sometimes I turn on the television and then ask myself if anyone really cares or thinks about what they are saying. I laugh and sometimes tell myself, "How did that make the news?" or "The news got it wrong again," or "This story is sensationalistic and really isn't as important as they make it sound."

When I hear a news story, I always check the internet to see what real people (bloggers, etc) are saying. The news channels are biased and can never get a story completely right. It's best to get multiple versions and opinions of a story so that you can have a clear picture of the truth. So in that sense I really appreciate the work of our online community.

News media really needs to embrace the bloggers and amateur journalists that exist today. Some news stations have actually improved in recent years; I hear many anchors using the phrase "citizen journalist" from time to time.

Tams R profile image

Tams R Level 5 Commenter 3 months ago

While I believe bloggers are more accurate and interested in the deeper details of the news, I cannot imagine the news being as detailed as a blogger. Even with all day news channels such as CNN, Fox and MSNBC, there isn't enough time in the day to express all the facts. I just wish they would focus on the more important ones.

Mtbailz profile image

Mtbailz Hub Author 3 months ago

I agree, there really isnt enough time. Unfortunately that's why TV "news" is not the best choice for getting news (but that's a personal opinion).

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working